- Amazing slow downer no stereo full#
- Amazing slow downer no stereo free#
- Amazing slow downer no stereo windows#
Slowing down recordings of tunes you want to learn gives you the best of both worlds.
Amazing slow downer no stereo full#
The question is how? Learning from tunes played at full speed is not for the faint of heart, and not likely to be the best way to discover the details that make a tune really special. There are lots of reasons to learn tunes by ear. Thus learning tunes by ear gives you the ability to find your own level within any recording, from the most basic to the most insanely detailed. The more you listen, the more you can discover.
But recordings can display an almost limitless depth. No wonder – their listening skills have had less practice.įurthermore, written notation is fixed. Musicians who have learned primarily from sheet music or video tutorials, where the parts are broken down slowly and methodically, are generally not as good at just picking up tunes in a session. It’s also a great way to learn because it develops the skills needed to swim when unfamiliar tunes come up in jam sessions. Learning in this way is an important part of the music itself. In part this because the various musical practices we lump under the term oldtime are themselves predominantly aural traditions, passed on by ear, in-person. There are lots of ways to learn to play oldtime, but for most people, most of the time the best way is by ear.
Amazing slow downer no stereo free#
YouTube and Timestretch are two good, free ways places to start.There are many free and paid programs that can help you do that.Learning tunes by ear is great – slowing tunes down makes that easier.And in extreme speed cases, it will be useless. And for the iPod, well you are going to pay for a junky sounding, slowed down, MP3/WMA.
Amazing slow downer no stereo windows#
I just mention this because a lot of people by these tools to slow down MP3's, and they don't do much better than the slow down piece that's right in Windows Media Player, for free. But, you will be able to slow it down at much lower speeds and have it still sound intact, because all the dat information is still intact. Yes, the WAV is larger.because it retains the closest to 100% of the original file. The WAV I'm talking about is an uncompressed copy of the original CD file/song. This is no better than the MP3 you started with. Now, this doesn't mean take an MP3 and convert it to WAV, because now you have a 1:1 file from a compressed original. But again, with MP3's you are going to be missing A LOT of frequencies and it's note perception is usually a crap shoot. Transcribe is nice for the fact that it note only slows down, but also gives you a note (really a frequency) readout.
My suggestion, and I know MP3's are easy to get, is to get the original CD for slowing down the hard stuff. Now, if you're learning BB King licks this isn't too bad, but if you are learning some Page, Beck, etc.and especially something like Mclaughlin or Dimeola.MP3 is pretty much useless for slowing down.Īlso if you are learning stuff like Chet Atkins, Joe Pass, or something like that where there's a A LOT harmony movement, that blending of notes becomes undistinguishable really quick. You know, that funky, wrabbly, scratchy sound you get when slowing MP3's pression is the reason.Įven with a 320K res MP3 you can only slow it down about 75% before it starts sounding horrible. When you start slowing down this compressed file you are not going to be able to slow down too far before you start noticing the missing data.I'm seriously notice to missing date. So, at regular speed this sounds great, again due to the algorithm. MP3 has such a killer algorithm that you hardly ever notice the missing data with a 128K and above resolution. You need to understand that MP3's are compressed files, and usually you are only getting about 10% of the original fidelity/files. Yes, Amazing Slower Downer is good, as is Transcribe, but Windows Media does a fine job too.but if you are using MP3's, read this.
0 kommentar(er)
